Nurs-Fpx 8022 Assessment 4 Quality Improvement Project Plan Using Informatics/Technology

Student name

NURS-FPX8022

Capella University

Professor Name

Submission Date

Quality Improvement Project Plan Using Informatics/Technology

An AI-based predictive analytics system embedded in the electronic health record (EHR) is one of the crucial quality improvement projects in Massachusetts general hospital (MGH), as it aims to eliminate chronic safety and coordination lapses defined by the current performance indicators. The project specifically aims to prevent the preventable events of harm as sepsis, patient falls, and adverse drug reactions, since the current Leapfrog Hospital Safety Grade of the facility is A and the postoperative sepsis score is alarming 4.69 (LeapFrog, n.d.). The predictive analytics project uses real-time data to identify patient deterioration in advance, reduce delays during care delivery and decrease the amount of errors. Since the effective implementation will improve clinical decision-making, Medicare Compare ratings, adverse patient outcomes, and adherence to national safety standards, the effort will follow the national healthcare quality standards and regulatory demands.

Problem Significance and Impact

The main issue at MGH consists of ongoing risks of safety and avoidable negative incidents, which lead to gaps in patient outcomes and system efficiency. The latest data shows an occurrence score of 1.02 that is damaging, and the patient fall rate of 0.199, meaning that there are areas of weaknesses, although the overall performance is high (LeapFrog, n.d.). Despite the fact that the EHR system deployed at MGH is innovative and has computerized physician order entry (CPOE) and clinical decision support (CDS), the current system does not have any predictive functions or real-time monitoring to prevent emergence of safety risks (Calduch et al., 2021). Technological disparity is the most evident in the inability to identify clinical degradation early or inform staff about the development of such complications as sepsis or directly prevent fall issues directly associated with adverse events.

The relevance of the issue is multidimensional as it has a direct impact on such stakeholders as the executive leadership, clinical departments, information technology (IT) professionals, medical staff, and legal and compliance teams. There is increasing pressure on executive leadership due to federal control systems, such as CMS, and the metrics of public reporting, in which failure to improve could impact reimbursement, and the reputation of the population (Kruse et al., 2022). Delayed intervention and inefficient processes are the challenges faced by clinical departments such as critical care, surgery, and nursing, whereas IT department has to deal with the integration, data governance, and system reliability (Garcia et al., 2022). Timely and correct insights are needed to make life-saving decisions by medical staff and bedside clinicians, but the existing system flaws prevent an early response and the detection of these problems, a fact that creates additional workload and ethical discomfort. Legal experts should make sure that all the practices are in line with the health insurance portability and accountability act (HIPAA), but the chances of breach of data and miscommunication are very high without improved digital security.

Data to Support the Problem and Trigger a Need for a Practice Change

The data provided with the Leapfrog hospital safety grade indicates that at MGH, certain performance issues related to patient safety are identified and require an immediate solution. The facility is rated as a whole as the general safety adherence is observed as an A type, however, some of the subcategories are characterized by severe gaps. The most worrisome is the postoperative sepsis score of 4.69 that is significantly above the national averages and represents a great threat to the recovery of patients (LeapFrog, n.d..; Medicare Compare, 2024). Equally, the harm events score of 1.02 and patient fall rate of 0.199 shows that there are common safety failures (LeapFrog, n.d.). The results indicate that even with a strong EHR, the absence of early detection tools is observed, and manual workflows remain the dominating ones in key safety-related processes. According to leapfrog data, MGH has good overall grade that still faces major safety issues, most notably postoperative sepsis and patient falls, which means that there is an urgent requirement of technological solutions helping deliver proactive, data-driven care.

Medicare Compare data is another confirmation to the quality gap. The MGH has been rated as five stars (patient experience), four stars (timeliness of care) and three stars (safety of care), which has given it the total rating of five stars (excellent, but with safety improvements possible) (Medicare Compare, 2024). However, local peer institutions, including Boston Medical Center and Tufts Medical Center were rated three stars overall, which implied that MGH is leading the region in terms of results and experience, yet it can still improve the reduction of harm events and better predictive safety practices (Medicare Compare, 2024). Although MGH beats its neighboring hospitals, the Medicare Compare information still demonstrates the differences in safety-related performance, in the case of adverse events and sepsis, which explains the dire necessity of a predictive, AI-enhanced informatics intervention. The performance gaps have a direct effect on reimbursement, central trust, and capability to provide high-reliability healthcare in a competitive clinical environment.

Technology/ Informatics Solution

The proposed decision is the introduction of an AI-based predictive analytics tool to be incorporated into the existing EHR system of the MGH organization. The integration will capitalize on real time information to foresee and prevent adverse effects like sepsis and patient falls as well as errors in medication. The areas of concern are those that Leapfrog and Medicare Compare data define. The vision of MGH is attractive to be an active patient-centered health organization that is both data-driven and predictive of the risk in advance, minimizes harm, and has a high rating both in Leapfrog and Medicare Compare performance rates (Mulac et al., 2021). The solution will involve the integration of evidence-based clinical rules, predictive models and customized clinical decision support systems and will provide the clinicians with adequate preparation to implement interventions at the appropriate time without making mistakes.

I think the technology enhancement will result in MGH being a national leader in the implementation of state-of-the-art informatics to patient care safety, personalization, and efficiency. The integrated predictive platform will also streamline the clinical workflows by automatically handling patient vitals, lab outcomes, and health history and sending early notifications of clinical deterioration. The system will evaluate sepsis and fall risk, give real-time alerts, and propose evidence-based interventions upon the admission of a patient (Dixon et al., 2024). It will also be connected with barcode medication administration, wearable monitoring devices, and patient portals so that the patient status will be tracked smoothly and end-to-end. The changes will directly respond to the weaknesses identified in the community by the postoperative sepsis rate of 4.69, harmful event rate of 1.02, and patient fall rate of 0.199 contributing to the improvement of the Leapfrog safety grading and Medicare Compare quality grade (LeapFrog, n.d.; Medicare Compare, 2024). The increased efficiency of the working process will lead to the reduction of the delays, the better distribution of the resources, and the increase of the patient safety.

Data Points

Postoperative Sepsis Rate

The key measure of information will be postoperative sepsis incidence which is a critical Leapfrog indicator. Existing Leapfrog and EHR data will be taken as baseline measurements. The monitoring tool will be the Leapfrog hospital safety grade dashboard (LeapFrog, n.d.). Thus, a quantifiable reduction of the score after the implementation will be used to show that predictive analytics are allowing the earlier identification and mitigation.

Patient Fall Rate

The measure will evaluate the inpatient falls per 1,000 patient days. The AI-enhanced motion sensors and risk scoring algorithm integrated system will trigger patient alerts when at-risk (Alharbi et al., 2023). The analytics will be performed in real time to enable intervention by the staff. Quarterly reviews will determine the decrease of the 0.199 fall rate, recorded in Leapfrog benchmarks, and make necessary changes to the fall prevention protocols.

Adverse Drug Events (ADEs)

Third critical data will be adverse medication events. The ADEs will be monitored using the help of EHR-integrated computerized physician order entry (CPOE) and barcode scanning technology (Calduch et al., 2021). Monthly reports on the performance will distinguish the trends of errors, and longitudinal analysis will be used to evaluate the improvement in prescription safety and compliance to the alert by the staff.

Implementation Plan

The given plan of the implementation of the AI-based predictive analytics integration is expected to mitigate the safety and coordination shortages at MGH by focusing on the preventable harm indicators revealed on the basis of Leapfrog data analysis and Medicare Compare data analysis. The step-by-step implementation plan, where critical care and surgical wards as high risk areas are first implemented, will ensure minimal interference and immediate influence on the performance outcomes. The training and onboarding plan of the entire clinical personnel will be based on the gaps in EHR application, burnout among clinicians, and the security of the data revealed in the evaluation of SAFER guides (Sittig et al., 2025). The administrative alignment, technical support and the clinical engagement that are the focal points of the plan offer the foundation of the sustainable improvement. The plan is pertinent to the problem directly since it implies the identification of root cause of safety incidents, the improvement of early detection and the automation of intervention protocols. By having targeted measures and a built-in monitoring system, MGH will be not only reducing the existing risks but also creating a robust, future-proof informatics system to maintain a consistent quality improvement.

Potential Implementation, Challenges, and Solutions

Lack of proper workforce coping strategies, lack of proper implementation of digital tools, lack proper and appropriate workload of data entry, lack of computer, lack of docusign, and explain deficient computer skills could be among EHR literature challenges (Kruse et al, 2022). EHR systems coupled with real time sensor, smart beds, and CDS alert systems could pose difficulties in wireless network and data traffic system management. The developed risk management plan suggests that these challenges can be handled in a streamlined manner. The Kotter model that identifies change management processes such as the creation of the change urgency, coalitions for guiding the change, and change enabling of the key primary workers, will inform personnel strategies (Miles et al 2022). There is anxiety with new implementation of technologies, and the model will build trust and mitigate fears.

The primary issues concerning smaller departments, or satellite clinics, relate to the expenses associated with infrastructure, staff training, and operational upkeep (Alder, 2024). These can be addressed with the combined approach of phased funding, vouchers for the units, and aggressive administrative advocacy for the capital investment needed to ensure smooth functioning at the start. In alignment with the objectives of MGH, the team for the workflow redesign consists of IT specialists, nurse informaticists, doctors, and some of the admins so that workflow alignment disruption can be refrained from during the specialty care planning roll out (Alami et al., 2022). Focused planning, strategic training, and proper mitigation of the barriers will help MGH realize the objectives of increased patient safety and improved performance indicators at the national level. Successful deployment of predictive analytics for which planning will provide the needed support.

Leaders Role in Change Management

The AI-based predictive analytics system that is being implemented at MGH is an attestation of leadership. The ones that need to be concerned with this initiative are the executive leadership, heads of each MGH department, nurse managers, IT directors, and champion physicians. All of these individuals need to collaborate in order to ensure that the change is accepted in every clinical and administrative configuration at the organization (Alami et al., 2022). The leaders need to create the vision, inspire passion, organize the vision, and ensure that they are meeting the necessary legal and ethical standards of the organization. Leadership is especially critical in this case because the EHR system integration is complicated, and MGH being a large organization has to seamlessly manage the coordination of multiple departments (Calduch et al., 2021). In this instance, there is a clear need to develop a change strategy that is aimed at communicating with the firm’s stakeholders and motivating them to act in order to realize the change. The expectation is that these managers will have to apply communication strategies that are variable in form, thus referred to in the case as multi-modal for the clinical, IT, and administrative teams, e.g., email, meetings, dashboards, and town halls.

In support of managing the updated concerns regarding the predictive analytics still used by the systems – the decreases in sepsis rates and patient falls must be publicized and defended. The Kruse report (2022) identifies the workload and the technical complexity apprehension that borders on phobia, and suggest countermeasures. Kotter’s eight-step change model will be the starting point. The Kotter model is designed with ample allocation of change urgency, and the empowerment and consolidation of the change process. At Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), leaders are using the Kotter model to navigate a common challenge: clinician pushback against the constant stream of new technologies added to their already heavy workloads. The model helps by emphasizing the importance of building a strong, influential coalition of clinical leaders and securing a few quick, visible wins to build momentum. MGH is well-positioned for success thanks to its robust EHR system and respected clinical champions. By proactively addressing universal concerns like resistance to change and potential gaps in digital skills, MGH’s leadership aims to ensure the transition is not just effective, but also sustainable and as seamless as possible for its staff.

Communication Plan

MGH is integrating a sophisticated AI system with its Electronic Health Record (EHR) to improve patient care, particularly after surgery. The AI analyzes vast amounts of data; including patient outcomes, surgical details, and even genomic information to predict potential complications and suggest personalized recovery plans. It’s designed to identify cost-saving opportunities and streamline workflows between different physicians and departments.